Is modi gay

On March 13, a bench led by Chief Justice of India D.Y.

Chandrachud referred several petitions seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriages in the country to a constitution bench of five judges of the Supreme Court. It said that western decisions sans any basis in Indian constitutional law jurisprudence could not be imported in this context. However, when the issue concerns the institution of marriage, it is a policy matter that needs serious discussion,” Rijiju said.

“This is what it’s all about. It should not be a scandal. This is a proud thing.” 

It’s this Moshiach energy that enables Rosenfeld, who also studied cantorial music at Yeshiva University’s Belz School of Music, to entrance audiences comprising Jews and non-Jews – of all denominations.

CJI Chandrachud was part of the constitution bench that decriminalised gay sex in 2018. Because let me tell you something, if you handle that the wrong way, you might find the kid hanging in the garage. “People should understand this comic that you love, this comic that you adore and that you’re hiring for events and cameos and performances – he’s gay.

It also submitted that the SC had only decriminalised sexual intercourse between same-sex persons in its 2018 judgment, but had not legitimised this “conduct”. These countries are Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Uruguay.

Modi later came out as gay and in 2020 married his partner Leo Veiga, who was raised Catholic and is also his manager. From bits about cultural differences between Sephardi (diaspora Jews of Spanish, Portuguese and North African descent) and Ashkenzi Jews (diaspora Jews with familial lineage in Western and Eastern Europe) to the results of his at-home DNA testing kit— “Nazis and Kanye are my number one health risks,” quips the Tel Aviv-born, New York-raised Jewish stand-up — Rosenfeld has the audience in stitches.

And at the same time, I realized that I was gay. The SC bench said that the case involved “interplay” between constitutional rights of life, liberty, dignity, equal treatment of members of the LGBTQ+ community members and specific statutory enactments which considered only a married union between a biological man and woman. When it comes to performing, he floats seamlessly between Jewish communities no matter the level of religious observance, from Hasidic to ultra-Reform.

You will get pleasure from the views.

Modi is the mononym of actor and comedian Mordechi Rosenfeld, who was born in Tel Aviv and moved with his family to the United States at the age of 7.

He keeps kosher and  he puts on tefillin and he goes to Shabbat services – but he is also gay,” says Rosenfeld, who credits his husband-manager, Leo Veiga, with helping to springboard his career these past several years. 

Whether it’s performing at a fundraiser for philanthropies such as Ohel Children’s Home and Family Services, which serves individuals with developmental disabilities, and Bikur Cholim, a Los Angeles-based Jewish health care and social support organization, or appearing as a featured guest on Howard Stern and playing himself on HBO’s sitcom“Crashing,” Rosenfeld does everything with Moshiach energy in mind. 

Part of that Moshiach energy is encouraging gay Jewish individuals, especially those from strict Orthodox backgrounds in which coming out as gay is often an alienating experience fraught with tension and anxiety, to forever remain proud of who they are. 

“I want a gay kid listening to me or reading this, a kid from, say, an Orthodox Jewish family, to know that you can still keep Shabbat and you can still be gay and you can still be happy and bring Moshiach energy into the world,” says Rosenfeld.

While the Union government has argued that the matter is best left to Parliament to deliberate and decide upon, the Supreme Court felt that the issues raised by these petitions were “seminal” and an “important matter”.